Werner Ulrich
(CT5.2) has developed a new method of estimating abundance of species
in a community by assessing the factor of competition between
individual species.
Laura Kehoe (CT5.3)
discussed Land Use Intensity as compared with biodiversity in a very
interesting talk, which showed globally, the areas which specifically
compare land with high anthropogenic use that is adjacent to natural
areas of high biodiversity. These high biodiversity to land use
regions were found to be dominantly in the tropics: Central America,
SE Asia and parts of Central Africa; regions with currently high
levels of deforestation. But also found within Southern America, Sth
Africa and parts of Australia. Significant areas with this high level
of land clash lie outside Conservation Internation Biodiversity
Hotspots.
Jenny McGuire
(CT5.4) modelled the potential movement of animals over negative
temperature gradients (due to climate change) finding worryingly that
only 22% of landscape patches within her USA model had enough
interconnectivity for successful movement. This is due to
anthropogenic land use changes, fragmenting the landscape, very high
in the agriculturally-rich eastern USA. Including climate corridors
in the models connected and improved this potential movement between
landscape patches greatly. How well will seemingly narrow vegetation
corridors work in reality?
Carston (CT5.5) gave
a thorough account of gaps within current global animal research
data, including methods and abilities to track and calculate ranges
of mammals. He showed that prioritization of data mobilisation is
necessary because data is heavily biased to Western research
organisations and completeness in overall data gaps would be
significantly improved by finding local data sources.
Ricardo Dobrovolski
(CT5.6) showed us that habitat amount determines the extinction risk
threshold on a macro-logical scale, for the individual and community
level
. These risk factors should be compiled and expanded upon in
the future to b used in conjunction with global climate change
models.
No comments:
Post a Comment
We don’t particularly approve anonymous comments, but they will be tolerated as long as they are not used to make “ad hominem” attacks to any of the IBS members.
Comments that do not meet this principle will not be published.